Ooh! I like that observation, jc. I'm going with reader-response theory and saying either (or both) interpretations are valid. Polyvalence. It simply depends on the interpreter.
And that interpretation too, my friend, is valid. It's all about the text that you bring to the text. And one's own text is, in large measure, formed by his/her significant other.
Gawd...my grammar is often quite atrocious. My previous post should have read..."either (or both) interpretation IS valid." Ughh!
MB. Though offensive, I suppose that interpretation is valid. I'm a product of post-modern education. All interpretations are destigmatized--even weirdo ones such as yours.
7 comments:
There is never enough time together or simply being together isn't enough?
Ooh! I like that observation, jc. I'm going with reader-response theory and saying either (or both) interpretations are valid. Polyvalence. It simply depends on the interpreter.
Nice. I'm going to say it depends on the person the interpreter is with!
And that interpretation too, my friend, is valid. It's all about the text that you bring to the text. And one's own text is, in large measure, formed by his/her significant other.
Gawd...my grammar is often quite atrocious. My previous post should have read..."either (or both) interpretation IS valid." Ughh!
I was thinking it was about me and yo mama.
How 'bout dat interpretation?
MB. Though offensive, I suppose that interpretation is valid. I'm a product of post-modern education. All interpretations are destigmatized--even weirdo ones such as yours.
Boom.
i wanna be stigmatized. stupid stupid post-modernity
Post a Comment